Users Online : 7679 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   |   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
 ¤   Similar in PUBMED
 ¤  Search Pubmed for
 ¤  Search in Google Scholar for
 ¤Related articles
 ¤   Article in PDF (1,068 KB)
 ¤   Citation Manager
 ¤   Access Statistics
 ¤   Reader Comments
 ¤   Email Alert *
 ¤   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 ¤  Abstract
 ¤ Introduction
 ¤ Case Report
 ¤ Discussion
 ¤ Conclusion
 ¤  References
 ¤  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1966    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents     
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 354-356

Management of portal annular pancreas during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

1 Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
2 Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy

Date of Submission22-Nov-2017
Date of Acceptance07-Feb-2018
Date of Web Publication3-Sep-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Giuseppe Zimmitti
Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, 25124 Brescia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_235_17

Rights and Permissions

 ¤ Abstract 

Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is a pancreatic congenital anomaly consisting of pancreatic parenchyma encircling the portal vein and/or the superior mesenteric vein. It has been reported that the risk of developing a post-operative pancreatic fistula is higher following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with PAP, probably because of the possibility of leaving undrained a portion of pancreatic parenchyma during the reconstructive phase. Few manuscripts have reported a surgical technique of pancreaticoduodenectomy in case of PAP, herein we report the first case of a patient with PAP undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Keywords: Circumportal pancreas, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreas anomaly, portal annular pancreas

How to cite this article:
Zimmitti G, Manzoni A, Ramera M, Villanacci A, Sega V, Treppiedi E, Guerini F, Garatti M, Codignola C, Rosso E. Management of portal annular pancreas during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Min Access Surg 2018;14:354-6

How to cite this URL:
Zimmitti G, Manzoni A, Ramera M, Villanacci A, Sega V, Treppiedi E, Guerini F, Garatti M, Codignola C, Rosso E. Management of portal annular pancreas during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 9];14:354-6. Available from:

 ¤ Introduction Top

Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is the rarest among pancreatic congenital anomalies, with a reported frequency around 1%,[1] and is the consequence of an aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal fetal pancreas on the right and left sides of portal vein (PV) and/or superior mesenteric vein (SMV), which are finally encircled by pancreatic parenchyma. PAP is asymptomatic; however, its recognition is crucial when a pancreaticoduodenectomy is planned, to minimise the risk of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF), reportedly more frequent in patients with PAP undergoing pancreatic surgery, and probably related to the possibility of leaving undrained an unrecognised portion of pancreatic parenchyma.[2] Previous articles have reported on pancreaticoduodenectomy performed in case of PAP, herein we describe the first case of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in a patient with PAP.

 ¤ Case Report Top

A 77-year-old affected by a 12-mm ampullary adenocarcinoma was referred to our centre. A pre-operative contrast-enhanced computed tomography-scan revealed the presence of pancreatic tissue encircling the PV [Figure 1]a, depicting a PAP. A slight dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) and the accessory pancreatic duct (APD) was found, without communication between two ducts.
Figure 1: (a) Pre-operative computed tomography-scan axial image showing portal annular pancreas, with pancreatic tissue anterior (asterisk) and posterior (star) to the portal vein. (b) Laparoscopic view of the main pancreatic stump (asterisk) and pancreatic parenchyma (star) posterior to the portal vein, before (b) and after (c) the beginning of transection

Click here to view

The patient was scheduled for an LPD. Laparoscopic ultrasonography confirmed PAP and excluded a communication between MPD and APD. Following pancreatic neck transection and retroportal lamina dissection, pancreatic tissue posterior to the PV was identified [Figure 1]b and transected [Figure 1]c. The resulting two pancreatic stumps were dissected from the PV until they merged with each other, where a further parenchymal transection was performed, removing about 2 cm of parenchyma, finally obtaining a single pancreatic stump. This was mobilised for about 4 cm to perform a pancreatogastrostomy as previously described[3] [Figure 2]a,[Figure 2]b,[Figure 2]c,[Figure 2]d.
Figure 2: Schematic representation of parenchymal and pancreatic duct distribution with respect to the portal vein and superior mesenteric artery (a); two pancreatic stumps can be identified after transection of pancreatic parenchyma, anterior, and posterior to the portal vein (b); following pancreatic mobilisation at the left of portal vein and superior mesenteric artery, additional 2 cm of pancreatic parenchyma are resected to obtain a single pancreatic stump (c), which is further mobilized (for about 4 cm) for the pancreatogastrostomy (d)

Click here to view

Pathological examination confirmed an ampullary adenocarcinoma (pT1N0R0). The patient recovered without complications and was discharged on the post-operative day 18.

 ¤ Discussion Top

Two classifications have been proposed for PAP, based on pancreatic ducts anatomy and their relation with PV/SMV[4] and on the extension of ventral and dorsal pancreas fusion posterior to PV/SMV,[1] respectively. In the case, we describe, pancreatic parenchyma encircled the PV, configuring type B PAP according to the classification described by Karasaki et al. We identified an MPD anterior to the PV and an APD posterior, configuring a type 3 PAP, according to Joseph classification. However, such particular scenario was not considered a contraindication to LPD, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on LPD in a patient with PAP.

During pancreaticoduodenectomy, the presence of PAP entails two modifications of the surgical procedure: (i) at least two transections of pancreatic parenchyma anterior and posterior to PV/SMV, are required; (ii) two resulting pancreatic stumps need to be taken into account for pancreatico-intestinal reconstruction. Previous reports have highlighted the importance of a clear assessment of pancreatic duct anatomy in patients with PAP to guarantee a proper drainage of every pancreatic segment. A previous report[5] showed that, when an intrapancreatic communication between two pancreatic ducts at the left of PV/SMV is found, it is possible to ligate the retroportal duct, while maintaining the drainage of the gland through the anteportal one. In the case, we report a clear communication between MPD and APD was not identified, thus the overmentioned solution was not feasible.

In addition, at our centre, pancreatico-intestinal continuity during LPD is routinely restored through a double purse-string pancreaticogastrostomy. Intraoperatively, we considered that a pancreatogastrostomy with two pancreatic stumps, though technically feasible, could be unsafe because it required a larger gastric wall incision to introduce the two stumps into the stomach, compared to the classic gastric incision performed for a single stump, thus jeopardising the anastomotic seal and increasing the risk of POPF. Consequently, we performed an additional parenchymal transection at the pancreatic body, to achieve a single pancreatic stump for pancreatic anastomosis.

 ¤ Conclusion Top

We report the first case of LPD in a patient with PAP. Despite the reported association between PAP and POPF, we do not believe that PAP represents an absolute contraindication to LPD. The surgical technique we describe proved to be feasible and safe and may represent an option for the surgical management of patients with PAP undergoing LPD.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 ¤ References Top

Karasaki H, Mizukami Y, Ishizaki A, Goto J, Yoshikawa D, Kino S, et al. Portal annular pancreas, a notable pancreatic malformation: Frequency, morphology, and implications for pancreatic surgery. Surgery 2009;146:515-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
Harnoss JM, Harnoss JC, Diener MK, Contin P, Ulrich AB, Büchler MW, et al. Portal annular pancreas: A systematic review of a clinical challenge. Pancreas 2014;43:981-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
Zimmitti G, Manzoni A, Addeo P, Garatti M, Zaniboni A, Bachellier P, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric artery- first approach and pancreatogastrostomy assisted by mini-laparotomy. Surg Endosc 2016;30:1670-1.  Back to cited text no. 3
Joseph P, Raju RS, Vyas FL, Eapen A, Sitaram V. Portal annular pancreas. A rare variant and a new classification. JOP 2010;11:453-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
Matsumoto I, Shinzeki M, Fukumoto T, Ku Y. An extremely rare portal annular pancreas for pancreaticoduodenectomy with a special note on the pancreatic duct management in the dorsal pancreas. Surgery 2013;153:434-6.  Back to cited text no. 5


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery—Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report
Saneya Pandrowala, Aamir Parray, Vikram Chaudhari, Shailesh V. Shrikhande, Manish S. Bhandare
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2021; 25(5): 1332
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Portal Annular Pancreas With Common Hepatic Artery Trajectory Abnormality
Munenori Tahara, Takuya Harada, Yosuke Wakui, Shoichiro Mizukami, Kengo Kita, Tohru Funakoshi, Kenji Wakayama, Hiroyuki Ishizu
Pancreas. 2021; 50(4): 639
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 A patient with a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreatic uncinate process with portal annular pancreas
Daisuke SHIRAI, Akihiro MURATA, Sadatoshi SHIMIZU, Shintaro KODAI, Kotaro MIURA, Akishige KANAZAWA
Suizo. 2021; 36(2): 128
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 A Case of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Type I Portal Annual Pancreas after Understanding of Pancreatic Ductal Anomalies
Eiji YOSHIDA, Hiroshi YAMAGUCHI, Masafumi IMAMURA, Minoru NAGAYAMA, Keiko SEGAWA, Shintaro SUGITA, Yasutoshi KIMURA, Ichiro TAKEMASA
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association). 2020; 81(5): 971
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article


© 2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04