|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 125-128
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours: Single team experience
Abhay N Dalvi, Pinky M Thapar, Vinaykumar B Thapar, Sameer A Rege, Aparna A Deshpande
Department of General Surgery, Seth G. S. Medical College and King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Submission||03-Apr-2011|
|Date of Acceptance||12-Jun-2011|
|Date of Web Publication||2-Nov-2012|
Abhay N Dalvi
257 Walkeshwar Road, Mumbai - 400 006, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the procedure of choice to treat benign functioning and non-functioning adrenal tumours. With improving experience, large adrenal tumours (> 5 cm) are being successfully tackled by laparoscopy. This study aims to present our single unit experience of LA performed for large adrenal masses. Materials and Methods: Forty-six laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed for large adrenal lesions more than 5 cm during the period 2001 to 2010 were reviewed. Results: A total of 46 adrenalectomies were done in 42 patients. The mean tumour size was 7.03 cm (5-15 cm). Fourteen patients had tumour size more than 8 cm. The lesions were localised on the right side in 17 patients and on the left side in 21 patients with bilateral tumours in 4 patients. Functioning tumours were present in 32 of the 46 patients. The average blood loss was 112 ml (range 20-400 ml) with the mean operating time being 144 min (range 45 to 270 min). Five patients required conversion to open procedure. Three of the 46 patients (6.52%) on final histology had malignant tumours. Conclusion: LA is safe and feasible for large adrenal lesions. Mere size should not be considered as a contraindication to laparoscopic approach in large adrenal masses. Graded approach, good preoperative assessment, team work and adherence to anatomical and surgical principles are the key to success.
Keywords: Adrenalectomy, laparoscopy, large tumours
|How to cite this article:|
Dalvi AN, Thapar PM, Thapar VB, Rege SA, Deshpande AA. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours: Single team experience. J Min Access Surg 2012;8:125-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Dalvi AN, Thapar PM, Thapar VB, Rege SA, Deshpande AA. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours: Single team experience. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2012 [cited 2021 Apr 22];8:125-8. Available from: https://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2012/8/4/125/103110
| ¤ Introduction|| |
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is one of the successful applications of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Since its first description, LA has been adopted quickly as the procedure of choice to treat benign functioning and non-functioning adrenal tumours.  The common indications include aldosteronoma, Cushing's syndrome, pheochromocytoma, virilising and feminising tumours, and benign non-functioning tumours.  The widespread adoption of LA has been partly due to the improvement in laparoscopic instrumentation and technical expertise and partly to the several trials demonstrating the superiority of the laparoscopic approach over traditional open surgery in the form of shorter hospital stay, early return to activity, less postoperative pain and fewer complications related to blood loss and surgical scar. ,,, As experience with the technique has increased, so have the indications, with reports of large tumours (more than 5 cm in diameter) being successfully removed using the laparoscopic approach. , However as the size of the adrenal gland increases so does the technical difficulty and increased risk of dealing with an malignant pathology of the gland. The principal concerns surrounding the laparoscopic approach to large adrenal tumours are the risk of an inadequate resection and the potential for port-site or peritoneal metastases, which would adversely affect the clinical outcome. 
At our institute, we followed the policy of graded approach by tackling smaller tumours in the initial part of our series before embarking onto more vascular and larger tumours. Herein we report our experience with 46 laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed for large adrenal masses (> 5 cm) and summarise the operative and postoperative outcomes. 
| ¤ Materials and Methods|| |
One hundred and six laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed by a single surgical team between 2001 and 2010. Of these 46 cases involving adrenal lesions, those greater than 5 cm were reviewed and are the focus of this study.
The department of endocrinology primarily evaluated these patients. Depending on the suspected pathology, appropriate hormonal workup was done including serum epinephrine / nor epinephrine, serum cortisol, serum ACTH levels, serum aldosterone and urinary VMA levels. Iodine 131 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan was done in patients with pheochromocytoma to rule out multiple and ectopic sites of overproduction. Contrast-enhanced computerised tomography (CECT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were relied upon in all cases to look for the size of the gland, relation to IVC on right side, renal vein on left side and presence or absence of lymph nodes. Tumours with obvious invasion of adjacent organs or distant metastasis were excluded.
All patients were operated using the lateral transperitoneal approach. The technique is described in detail elsewhere.  All patients were operated under general anaesthesia. Carboperitoneum was maintained at 12 mm Hg.
For the right side, four to five working ports were placed. The liver was mobilised and retracted via the epigastric port. The thin layer of fascia covering the IVC was incised along the right lateral border and the same incision was extended along the peritoneum on the inferior aspect of the liver, laterally up to the right triangular ligament. The latter maneuver aided in additional retraction of the liver and exposure of the gland and the vein. A plane was created between the adrenal gland and the IVC at the lower aspect of the tumour to reach the retroperitoneal muscle and the dissection proceeded cephalad reaching the adrenal vein. The specimen side of the vein was clipped first and with two clips on patient side, the vein was divided. The gland was then dissected free from the surrounding structures.
For the left side, three to four subcostal ports were used. The peritoneum on the lateral aspect of the descending colon was serially incised and the incision extended superiorly to incise the spleno-renal ligament till greater curvature of stomach was seen. This allowed complete retraction of the spleen-pancreas complex and the colon by positional gravity exposing the adrenal tumour and the kidney enveloped in the Gerota's fascia. Dissection was done at the site of the renal hilum, for identification of the renal vein. The adrenal vein was identified along the superior border of the renal vein. This was clipped (specimen side first) and divided. The adrenal gland was then dissected free from the surrounding structures and additional adrenal branches of inferior phrenic vessels were clipped or coagulated.
The difficulties due to the overhanging nature of these large adrenal tumours were overcome by use of lateral ports for retraction. Increased vascularity and desmoplastic reaction, seen in large tumours especially pheochromocytoma was countered with the use of ultrasonic dissector. To avoid breech of oncologic principles of rupture and spillage, two lateral ports were joined that enabled an intact removal of the gland in a retrieval bag. The ports were closed using monofilament nylon and skin with clips. No drains were used.
| ¤ Results|| |
A total of 46 adrenalectomies were done in 42 patients for tumours greater than 5 cm. The average age was 33.6 years (range 16 - 62 years) with the male to female ratio of 1.6:1. Functioning tumours were present in 32 of the 46 patients.
The mean tumour size was 7.03 cm with range of 5 to 15 cm. 14 patients had tumour size more than 8 cm. The lesions were localised on the right side in 17 patients and on the left side in 21 patients with bilateral tumours in 4 patients.
The average blood loss was 112 ml (range 20 - 400 ml). The mean operating time was 144 min (range 45 to 270 min) with the average operating time for the right side being 134 min and the left side being 138 min. The average operating time for bilateral tumours was 165 min.
Five patients required conversion to open procedure. Bleeding was the cause of conversion in three patients of large pheochromocytomas (size 8 cm and above), of which two patients were pregnant. Technical difficulty in one patient of paraganglioma situated in the aorto-caval window and local invasion in a patient with adrenocortical sarcoma were the cause of conversion in the other two patients. The mean in-hospital stay was 4 days (2-8 days) with no major post-operative complications. Results are summarised in [Table 1].
The final histological examinations revealed pheochromocytoma (n=26), paraganglioma ( n =4), adenomyolipoma (n=7), Cushing's disease (n=4), schwannoma (n=1), tuberculosis (n=1), carcinoma (n=2) and adrenocortical sarcoma (n=1). Three of the 46 patients (6.52%) had malignant tumours. One patient (adrenocortical sarcoma) died of metastasis three months after surgery. One patient developed incisional hernia through the specimen retrieval site two years postoperatively that was corrected surgically. The mean follow up is 26 months.
| ¤ Discussion|| |
The history of large open adrenalectomy dates back to 1890, when Knowsley Thornton reported excision of a large suprarenal tumour weighing more than 20 pounds necessitating concomitant nephrectomy.  In the initial years there were many innovations and modifications for the approach to adrenal gland, only intent being better access. Gagner's description of laparoscopic approach in 1992 changed the scenario, making LA a gold standard for wide range of adrenal disorders. , Shorter hospital stay, early return to activity, less postoperative pain and fewer complications related to blood loss and surgical scar are the proven benefits of the laparoscopic approach. ,,,
Three issues are of utmost importance while dealing with large adrenal tumour. First is the intra-operative technical difficulty due to distorted anatomy and overhanging on surrounding important vascular pedicles, the second being the risk of dealing with a malignant neoplasm. The third issue is retrieval of these large tumours without intra peritoneal spillage.
As the size of the adrenal tumour increases, the surrounding anatomy is disturbed - inferior vena cava (IVC), liver and kidney on the right and spleno-pancreas complex and kidney on the left. This is especially true for pheochromocytoma or malignant tumours. Large tumours often overhang the adrenal vein and the IVC on the right side and the renal vein on the left side. Pheochromocytomas also elicit an intense desmoplastic reaction which leads to numerous dilated vessels in the vicinity of the tumour. However in non-functional benign large adrenal tumours, the planes are well maintained.
A swimmer is faster if he/she displaces the water rather than trying to push the body forward. The same principle was applied in our series by displacing the surrounding structures without handling the tumour. Use of additional lateral port for retraction helped us create a plane between the tumour and surrounding structures. Vascular large tumours need to be respected or else they start crying with "blood filled tears". Use of ultrasonic dissector helps in maintaining a near bloodless field. It is important to always first clip the adrenal vein on the specimen side before clipping on the patient side; else the vein dilates and can lead to hemorrhage. Our results show that large tumours can be safely tackled using the laparoscopic approach with reasonable operative times, blood loss and conversion rates. Numerous publications in recent times have demonstrated safety of the laparoscopic approach for large adrenal tumours greater than 5 cm. ,,,,, There is no real consensus on the definition of large adrenal tumour. While most publications support the size of 5 cm as "large", ,,, there are a few recent reports suggesting a size of 6 to 8 cm that should be treated as large. , Analysis of our results had started in 2008 and hence the need to stick to 5 cm as the size to call it large. The mean size of the glands tackled was 7.03 cm that was similar to that published by Desai et al. 
Malignancies of the adrenal gland may arise from the cortex or medulla or may be metastatic. The relationship of size of the adrenal gland with malignancy is a grey zone with varied opinions. The risk of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) in an incidentally discovered adrenal tumour is 2% for tumours less than 4 cm, 6% for tumours between 4 and 6 cm, and greater than 25% for tumours larger than 6 cm.  Between 5 and 26% of pheochromocytomas are malignant.  However, most large tumours are still benign. Numerous predictors for malignancy other than size like family history, presence of virilising features, mixed hormonal secretion, solid areas on imaging and rapid enhancement and rapid washout on MRI contrast imaging have been suggested.  Unfortunately only local invasion and presence of metastases are the only two reliable signs which accurately predict malignancy. In our series, only 3 of the 46 tumours turned out to be malignant (6%) which suggests that most large tumours without evidence of invasion or metastasis on radiology preoperatively turn out to be benign. Similar results have been reported by other series. ,,, Thus if size is the sole criterion on which the choice of operative approach is based, many patients with benign large adrenal lesions would have an unnecessary open adrenalectomy that might increase their morbidity and deprive them of the benefits of LA.
In the absence of unequivocally preoperative or intra-operative local invasion, the appropriate procedure for an adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is simple adrenalectomy. The laparoscopic view offers an excellent magnified view and makes the dissection of the adrenal gland possible. The laparoscopic approach offers as good if not better a chance of complete resection of the adrenal gland as the open approach. Long-term results of ACCs treated laparoscopically compare favorably well with those achieved with the open approach and recurrence of malignant disease has more to do with the biology of disease processes than surgical approach adopted at initial resection.  In our small experience of three malignant cases, we noticed uncomfortable thick adherence between other neighboring organs as a criteria for malignancy that was difficult to dissect. Possibly, conversion to open is required in these patients.
Retrieval of these large tumours can be a technical problem. It is important to avoid tumour rupture and spillage. Literature seems markedly silent on retrieval of larger tumours. Hand-assisted laparoscopic dissection is recommended by Shen et al, wherein the handport aids in retraction of the overhanging tumour and the same incision is then utilised for specimen extraction.  This approach would be useful for non-functioning tumours. In our experience, size is not a cause of conversion but the obscured anatomy and possible infiltration into surrounding structures is definitely a cause. In functioning tumours like a pheochromocytoma, handling can lead to fluctuations of blood pressure and disaster.
We routinely place these tumours in retrieval bags and extract the specimen by joining the incision taken for the lateral ports. We feel this is the safest though less cosmetic for retrieving these tumours.
LA is a procedure that is performed infrequently when compared to other advanced procedures like colectomy, splenectomy and even bariatric procedures. In open surgery, surgeon's eyes, mind and the hands work in tandem to perform a particular task. In laparoscopic surgery, the tip of the telescope is the eye of the surgeon that is controlled by the camera person. Therefore, the camera person has to read the surgeons' mind allowing the surgeon to make maneuvers of his choice. If a group of individuals work together performing a given procedure repetitively, the team automatically enhances in performance. Ramirez-Plaza CP et al echoes this sentiment and has proposed outpatient LA in selected group of patients.  Therefore, the concept of team work as suggested by us assumes importance in performance of LA for large adrenal tumours.
| ¤ Conclusion|| |
Our results show that mere size should not be considered as a contraindication to laparoscopic approach in large adrenal masses. Preoperative assessment and planning, team work, experience and adherence to anatomical and surgical principles are the key to success.
| ¤ References|| |
|1.||Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1033. |
|2.||Shen TW, Sturgeon C, Duh QY. From incidentaloma to adrenocortical carcinoma: the surgical management of adrenal tumors. J Surg Oncol 2005;89:186-92. |
|3.||Sturgeon C, Kebebew E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for malignancy. Surg Clin North Am 2004;84:755-74. |
|4.||Prinz RA. A comparison of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomies. Arch Surg 1995;130:489-92. |
|5.||Brunt LM, Doherty GM, Norton JA, Soper NJ, Quasebarth MA, Moley JF. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms. J Am Coll Surg 2004;183:1-10. |
|6.||Jacobs JK, Goldstein RE, Geer RJ. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. A new standard of care. Ann Surg 2004;225:495-502. |
|7.||Kebebew E, Siperstein AE, Duh QY. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the optimal surgical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11:409-13. |
|8.||Gagner M, Pomp A, Heniford BT, Pharand D, Lacroix A. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 1997;226:238-46. |
|9.||Assalia A, Gagner M. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1259-74. |
|10.||Dalvi AN, Thapar PM, Vijay Kumar K, Kamble RS, Rege SA, Deshpande AA, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Gaining experience by graded approach. J Minim Access Surg 2006;2:59-66. |
|11.||Thornton JK. Abdominal nephrectomy for large sarcoma of the left suprarenal capsule: recovery. Trans Clin Soc Lond 1890;23:150-3. |
|12.||Porpiglia F, Destefanis P, Fiori C, Giraudo G, Garrone C, Scarpa RM, et al. Does adrenal size really affect safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Urology 2002;60:801-5. |
|13.||Novitsky YW, Czerniach DR, Kercher KW, Perugini RA, Kelly JJ, Litwin DE. Feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal masses. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003;13:106-10. |
|14.||Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, La Torre M, Di Benedetto F, Ercolani G, Ravaioli M, et al. Is laparoscopic adrenalectomy safe and effective for adrenal masses larger than 7cm? Surg Endosc 2008;22:516-21. |
|15.||Palazzo FF, Sebag F, Sierra M, Ippolito G, Souteyrand P, Henry JF. Long-term outcome following laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large solid adrenal cortex tumors. World J Surg 2006;30:893-8. |
|16.||Rosoff JS, Raman JD, Del Pizzo JJ. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal masses. Curr Urol Rep 2008;9:73-9. |
|17.||Sharma R, Ganpule A, Veeramani M, Sabnis RB, Desai M. Laparoscopic management of adrenal lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter. Urol J 2009;6:254-9. |
|18.||Erbil Y, Barbaros U, Karaman G, Bozbora A, Ozarmaðan S. The change in the principle of performing laparoscopic adrenalectomy from small to large masses. Int J Surg 2009;7:266-71. |
|19.||Hemal AK, Singh A, Gupta NP. Whether adrenal mass more than 5 cm can pose problem in laparoscopic adrenalectomy? An evaluation of 22 patients. World J Urol 2008;26:505-8. |
|20.||Papalia R, Simone G, Leonardo C, Loreto A, Coppola R, Guaglianone S, et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal right adrenalectomy for 'large' tumors. Urol Int 2008;81:437-40. |
|21.||Zografos GN, Farfaras A, Vasiliadis G, Pappa T, Aggeli C, Vasilatou E, et al. Laparoscopic resection of large adrenal tumors. JSLS 2010;14:364-8. |
|22.||Karanikola E, Tsigris C, Kontzoglou K, Nikiteas N. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: where do we stand now? Tohoku J Exp Med 2010;220:259-65. |
|23.||Kebebew E, Duh QY. Adrenal Incidentaloma. In: Cameron JL, editor. Current surgical therapy. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. p. 575-9. |
|24.||Zografos GN, Vasiliadis G, Farfaras AN, Aggeli C, Digalakis M. Laparoscopic surgery for malignant adrenal tumors. JSLS 2009;13:196-202. |
|25.||Shen WT, Kebebew E, Clark OH, Duh QY. Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open or hand-assisted adrenalectomy: review of 261 laparoscopic adrenalectomies from 1993 to 2003. World J Surg 2004;28:1176-9. |
|26.||Ramírez-Plaza CP, Rodríguez-Cañete A, Domínguez-López ME, Valle-Carbajo M, Jiménez-Mazure C, Marín-Camero N, et al. [Development and evolution of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in an specialized team: From the beginning to the outpatient setting]. Endocrinol Nutr 2010;57:22-7. |
|This article has been cited by|
||Primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia
| ||Agostino De Venanzi,Guilherme Asmar Alencar,Isabelle Bourdeau,Maria Candida Barisson Villares Fragoso,André Lacroix |
| ||Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity. 2014; 21(3): 177 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large adrenal masses: Single team experience
| ||A. Agrusa,G. Romano,G. Frazzetta,D. Chianetta,V. Sorce,G. Di Buono,G. Gulotta |
| ||International Journal of Surgery. 2014; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Laparoscopic adrenal surgery: Ten-year experience in a single institution
| ||Conzo, G., Pasquali, D., Della Pietra, C., Santini, L., Sinisi, A.A. |
| ||BMC Surgery. 2013; 13(S5) |