Users Online : 10129 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   |   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
  Search
 
  
 ¤   Similar in PUBMED
 ¤  Search Pubmed for
 ¤  Search in Google Scholar for
 ¤   Article in PDF (128 KB)
 ¤   Citation Manager
 ¤   Access Statistics
 ¤   Reader Comments
 ¤   Email Alert *
 ¤   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 ¤  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2353    
    Printed118    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded102    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents     
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 161
 

Is oesophageal manometry a must before laparoscopic fundoplication?


Ronak Endo-laparoscopy and General Surgical Hospital, Patan, Gujarat, India

Date of Web Publication26-Mar-2011

Correspondence Address:
Vipul D Yagnik
77, Siddhraj Nagar, Rajmahal Road, Patan-384 265, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.78357

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Yagnik VD. Is oesophageal manometry a must before laparoscopic fundoplication?. J Min Access Surg 2011;7:161

How to cite this URL:
Yagnik VD. Is oesophageal manometry a must before laparoscopic fundoplication?. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2021 Oct 25];7:161. Available from: https://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2011/7/2/161/78357


Dear Sir,

I read the article entitled, "Is esophageal manometry a must before laparoscopic fundoplication? Analysis of 46 consecutive patients treated without preoperative manometry," [1] with great interest. I would like to congratulate all authors for performing such a study on patients from developing countries, where all the facilities are not available. However, certain aspects need clarificaration. Endoscopy is typically the first test to diagnose gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the two major pitfalls of endoscopy are: (1) Mucosal changes are absent in 50% of the cases [2] and (2) Interobserver variation is present, particularly for low-grade oesophagitis. [3] Looking into these pitfalls, is it justified to go for surgery only on the basis of endoscopic diagnosis? How do you decide which type of operation is indicated in particular patients? It is well known that manometry gives an idea about the propulsive force of the body of the oesophagus. Oesophageal manometry assessed the, length, location, and pressure of the LES(Lower Esophageal Sphincter), along with its ability to relax during swallowing. In addition, it also allows proper placement of the probe for ambulatory pH monitoring. Tailoring of the antireflux procedure is based on peristaltic contraction. Patients with normal peristalsis do better with a full 360 fundoplication, while patients with peristaltic failure do well with partial fundoplication. I would like to know from the authors, whether they recommend a full 360 fundoplication for all patients. Do they not recommend 24-hour pH monitoring as a pre-operative investigation? Ambulatory pH monitoring is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of GERD, with a sensitivity and specificity of about 92%. [4] It is of key importance in the workup for the following reasons. Ambulatory pH monitoring is the only way to quantitatively express the overall degree and pattern of oesophageal acid exposure, both of which may impact the decision towards surgery. It gives an idea about abnormal reflux. In the UCSF(University of California,San Francisco) study, [3] pH monitoring yielded normal results in 30% of the patients, with a clinical proven diagnosis of GERD, thereby obviating the need for the continuation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or the performance of an antireflux surgery. Not only is this study is retrospective, but it is non-comparative, so we have no way to evaluate whether the suggested approach to go for surgery without manometry and pH study has any advantage over the established gold standard. I think a well-designed, randomised, controlled trial is required to prove whether manometry should be performed or not.

 
 ¤ References Top

1.Nagpal AP, Soni H, Haribhakti S. Is oesophageal manometry a must before laparoscopic fundoplication? Analysis of 46 consecutive patients treated without preoperative manometry. J Min Access Surg 2010;6:66-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Patti MG, Diener U, Tamburini A, Molena D, Way LW. Role of esophageal function tests in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 2001;46:597-602.   Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Bytzer P, Havelund T, Moller Hansen J. Inter-observer variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:119.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Fuchs KH, DeMeester TR, Albertucci M. Specificity and sensitivity of objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery 1987;102:575.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    



This article has been cited by
1 Authorsę reply
Nagpal, A., Soni, H., Haribhakti, S.
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2011; 7(2): 161-162
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

© 2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04