Users Online : 1088 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   |   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (101 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded196    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2005  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 82-83

Cholecystomegaly: Laparoscopic treatment

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

Correspondence Address:
K L Harold
13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.16534

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Tessier D J, McMahon L, Harold K L. Cholecystomegaly: Laparoscopic treatment. J Min Access Surg 2005;1:82-3

How to cite this URL:
Tessier D J, McMahon L, Harold K L. Cholecystomegaly: Laparoscopic treatment. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2005 [cited 2021 Aug 5];1:82-3. Available from:

A 78-year-old patient was noted to be severely anemic (Hb 4.9) during a hospital admission in August 2002 for lightheadedness. She underwent a thorough workup including an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan which demonstrated a mildly dilated gallbladder and possible pancreatic mass. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was performed which showed a mildly dilated common bile duct without filling defects. No abnormalities were identified in the pancreas. During ERCP it was noted that the patient had a large hiatal hernia with Cameron's lesions. She subsequently underwent a laparoscopic fundoplication with resolution of her anemia. The patient did well for 16 months until she presented to her primary care physician with back pain. On physical examination she had a large abdominal mass. She underwent a CT scan that demonstrated marked enlargement of her gallbladder extending below her pelvic brim [Figure - 1]. Her liver function tests were normal. MRCP demonstrated normal pancreatic and common bile ducts along with the dilated gallbladder. Due to the large size of the gallbladder and history of ductal dilatation, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was recommended. At the time of operation the gallbladder was found to be massively dilated with a thickened wall [Figure - 2]. Needle decompression (with extraction of 200 cm3 of bile) was used to decrease the gallbladder size and make it manageable. The gallbladder was successfully removed laparoscopically using a standard dissection and port placement. The specimen was removed through the umbilical port, which required slight enlargement for extraction. Intraoperative cholangiogram showed normal bile duct size without filling defects. The specimen measured 17 cm X 8 cm X 2 cm. Pathology showed impaction of a stone in the neck of the gallbladder, explaining the dilatation, as well as acute and chronic cholecystitis. At 6-month follow up the patient is doing well and her back pain has resolved.

Since its introduction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the preferred treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis.[1] Relative contraindications include cirrhosis, coagulopathy, pancreatitis, pregnancy, morbid obesity, and severe cardiorespiratory insufficiency.[2] A theoretical risk with a massively dilated gallbladder is volvulus. Gallbladder volvulus is a rare event with less that 400 cases reported in the literature to date.[3] Volvulus commonly occurs in elderly women with visceroptosis. There are two known anatomic conditions that predispose a patient to volvulus. A gallbladder that is not anchored to the liver bed and only has attachment via the cystic artery and duct is at risk for torsion. Additionally, a gallbladder with a very long mesentery, as can be seen with long-standing massive dilatation, may also undergo volvulus. Unfortunately, neither of these conditions can be definitively diagnosed preoperatively to determine who is at risk. Given the massive size of the gallbladder in our patient we felt laparoscopic cholecystectomy was warranted. This case demonstrates the ability to safely perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy even in the setting of a massively dilated gallbladder. Additionally, it highlights the possibility of an impacted stone when a dilated gallbladder is encountered, even in a chronic setting. A preoperative ultrasound may have diagnosed the impacted gallstone compared to CT.

  References Top

1.Mouret P. From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to frontiers of laparoscopic surgery. Dig Surg 1991;8:125-5.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary surgery. Surg Endosc 2000;14:771-2.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Ortiz-Gonzales J, Reyes-Segura M, et al. Volvulus of the gallbladder. Dig Dis Sci 2003 48:1116-7.  Back to cited text no. 3    


[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article


2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04