Journal of Minimal Access Surgery

UNUSUAL CASE
[Download PDF]
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 279--281

Robot-assisted restorative proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis for anorectal malignant melanoma: An unusual case report

Yi-Chien Hsieh1, Ching-Wen Huang1, Wei-Chih Su1, Cheng-Jen Ma1, Yen-Cheng Chen1, Jaw-Yuan Wang2,  
1 Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
2 Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Jaw-Yuan Wang
Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung 807
Taiwan

Abstract

Anorectal malignant melanoma is a very rare but aggressive cancer which carries poor prognosis. Surgical intervention is the main management but whether wide local excision or abdominoperineal resection has better survival benefit remains controversial. However, robotic-assisted restorative proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis with intersphincteric resection (ISR) has not been reported yet. Hence, we presented a case with anorectal malignant melanoma treated with robotic-assisted ISR with coloanal anastomosis. The patient has satisfied post-operative life quality, and no local recurrence was noted after 3-year follow-up.



How to cite this article:
Hsieh YC, Huang CW, Su WC, Ma CJ, Chen YC, Wang JY. Robot-assisted restorative proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis for anorectal malignant melanoma: An unusual case report.J Min Access Surg 2020;16:279-281


How to cite this URL:
Hsieh YC, Huang CW, Su WC, Ma CJ, Chen YC, Wang JY. Robot-assisted restorative proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis for anorectal malignant melanoma: An unusual case report. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 13 ];16:279-281
Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2020/16/3/279/272104


Full Text



 Introduction



Rectal malignant melanoma is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis which has a reported 5-year survival rate of 10%–20%.[1] Surgical resection of the tumour is the primary management technique, but wide local excision (WLE) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) remains controversial. No robotic surgery used in cases of rectal melanoma has been published in PubMed through January 2019. Herein, we report a patient with rectal melanoma who was treated successfully through robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) with coloanal anastomosis, and no local recurrence was found during a 3-year follow-up.

 Case Report



A 70-year-old man experienced abdominal fullness sensation and epigastralgia for months. This case is already applied for institutional review board (IRB). During colonoscopy examination, a polyp-like lesion with grey mucosa was noted at the rectum [Figure 1]a, 2 cm above the anal verge. Biopsy revealed pathology diagnosis of malignant melanoma. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a polypoid lesion at the rectum [Figure 1]b. Positron emission tomography CT revealed a small, enhanced fluorodeoxyglucose avid lesion in the rectum but less imaging evidence of adventitia invasion [Figure 1]c. APR was suggested to the patient, but he preferred sphincter preservation. Therefore, robotic-ISR with coloanal anastomosis and temporary transverse colostomy was performed. He recovered satisfactorily and was discharged uneventfully after a post-operative hospital stay of 7 days. The colostomy was closed 1 year later. The tissue specimen pathology report indicated a polypoid tumour (2 cm × 1 cm) composed of large, epithelioid cells bearing hyperchromatic and pleomorphic nuclei and forming abundant melanin deposition [Figure 1]d, consistent with malignant melanoma, pathological stage T1N0M0. The patient is currently undertaking pembrolizumab immunotherapy for liver and brain metastasis. No evidence of local recurrence was noted during the 3-year follow-up.{Figure 1}

Surgical procedure

The technique incorporates abdominal and perineal approach. Under endotracheal general anaesthesia, the patient was placed in the Lloyd-Davies position. Trocars were inserted and positioned as shown in [Figure 2]. A Da Vinci robotic (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) system was docked to the left of the patient's caudal side. Maryland bipolar forceps, a permanent cautery spatula and a double fenestrated grasper were used as robotic instruments. Dissection was completed around the origin of the inferior mesentery artery with apical lymph node dissection, and the superior rectal vessels were ligated using robotic Hem-o-Lok clips and transected.[2] Subsequently, pelvic total mesocolic excision was performed until reaching the pelvic floor. After undocking the Da Vinci robotic system, perineal surgery commenced with stay suture of the anal canal. ISR was performed by dividing the anal mucosa and internal anal sphincter circumferentially. The specimen was pulled through the anal canal, and coloanal anastomosis was performed by a hand-sewn method.{Figure 2}

 Discussion



The incidence of primary anorectal melanoma was reported to be 0.5%–1.6% of all melanomas, making it the third most common location of primary melanoma after the skin and retina.[1] The prognosis is relatively poor, with a reported median overall survival (OS) of only 14–22 months and a 5-year survival rate of <20%.[1]

Surgical approaches of such melanoma are still widely discussed. APR has been considered to obtain greater local control and enable lymph node dissection; however, WLE has become more popular in recent years due to sphincter preservation and a quick recovery.[1] Heeney et al. reported a systemic review that showed no statistical difference in OS between APR and WLE groups.[3] Similarly, Iddings et al. reported OS of 16 versus 18 months for APR and WLE groups, respectively.[4] Hence, Latteri et al. suggested that APR should be considered only when WLE is not possible technically or in case of recurrence. In addition, laparoscopic APR can be applied when technically possible to reduce morbidity and achieve shorter recovery.[1]

Robotic-ISR has increased in cases of lower rectal malignancy because it is technically demanding for total mesorectal excision in the narrow pelvic cavity, especially when the tumour is located just above the anal verge.[5] The robotic surgery system has the advantages of an operator-controlled camera, effective countertraction with a third robotic arm and endo-wrist function that can overcome the technical difficulties of using a laparoscope.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of anorectal melanoma treated using robot-assisted ISR with coloanal anastomosis. This treatment can provide the patient with a better life quality without the need for permanent stoma, and it can obtain a completed lymph node dissection with a favourable negative resection margin. To date, the OS is 38 months without local recurrence, which seems on par with APR or WLE. However, due to the limited case experience, further case series should be conducted to verify our findings in this rare disease.

 Conclusion



No consensus has been reached on which surgical method is optimal for treating anorectal melanoma. Robot-assisted ISR may be an effective and safe option with favourable clinical outcomes without permanent colostomy.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants through funding from the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH107-7M23). In addition, this study was supported by the Grant of Biosignature in Colorectal Cancers, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, R.O.C. and a grant from Kaohsiung Medical University (KMU-S105011 and KMU-PT10616). This manuscript was edited by Wallace Academic Editing.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Latteri S, Teodoro M, Malaguarnera M, Mannino M, Currò G, La Greca G, et al. Abdominal perineal resection or wilde local excision in primary anorectal malignant melanoma. Case report and review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2017;19:74-7.
2Huang CW, Yeh YS, Su WC, Tsai HL, Choy TK, Huang MY, et al. Robotic surgery with high dissection and low ligation technique for consecutive patients with rectal cancer following preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016;31:1169-77.
3Heeney A, Mulsow J, Hyland JM. Treatment and outcomes of anorectal melanoma. Surgeon 2011;9:27-32.
4Iddings DM, Fleisig AJ, Chen SL, Faries MB, Morton DL. Practice patterns and outcomes for anorectal melanoma in the USA, reviewing three decades of treatment: Is more extensive surgical resection beneficial in all patients? Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:40-4.
5Yoo BE, Cho JS, Shin JW, Lee DW, Kwak JM, Kim J, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: Comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:1219-25.