Journal of Minimal Access Surgery

[View FULLTEXT] [Download PDF]
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 163--167

Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis

Naga Venkatesh G Jayanthi, Simon P.L. Dexter, Abeezar I Sarela, The Leeds Gastroparesis Multi-Disciplinary Team* 
 Department of Upper Gastro-Intestinal, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom

Correspondence Address:
Abeezar I Sarela
Consultant Surgeon, Hinduja Hospital, Mahim, Mumbai
United Kingdom

Background: Severe, drug-resistant gastroparesis is a debilitating condition. Several, but not all, patients can get significant relief from nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation (GES). A trial of temporary, endoscopically delivered GES may be of predictive value to select patients for laparoscopic-implantation of a permanent GES device. Materials and Methods: We conducted a clinical audit of consecutive gastroparesis patients, who had been selected for GES, from May 2008 to January 2012. Delayed gastric emptying was diagnosed by scintigraphy of ≥50% global improvement in symptom-severity and well-being was a good response. Results: There were 71 patients (51 women, 72%) with a median age of 42 years (range: 14-69). The aetiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic (43 patients, 61%), diabetes (15, 21%), or post-surgical (anti-reflux surgery, 6 patients; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 3; subtotal gastrectomy, 1; cardiomyotomy, 1; other gastric surgery, 2) (18%). At presentation, oral nutrition was supplemented by naso-jejunal tube feeding in 7 patients, surgical jejunostomy in 8, or parenterally in 1 (total 16 patients; 22%). Previous intervention included endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (botox) into the pylorus in 16 patients (22%), pyloroplasty in 2, distal gastrectomy in 1, and gastrojejunostomy in 1. It was decided to directly proceed with permanent GES in 4 patients. Of the remaining, 51 patients have currently completed a trial of temporary stimulation and 39 (77%) had a good response and were selected for permanent GES, which has been completed in 35 patients. Outcome data are currently available for 31 patients (idiopathic, 21 patients; diabetes, 3; post-surgical, 7) with a median follow-up period of 10 months (1-28); 22 patients (71%) had a good response to permanent GES, these included 14 (68%) with idiopathic, 5 (71%) with post-surgical, and remaining 3 with diabetic gastroparesis. Conclusions: Overall, 71% of well-selected patients with intractable gastroparesis had good response to permanent GES at follow-up of up to 2 years.

How to cite this article:
Jayanthi NG, Dexter SP, Sarela AI, TD. Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis.J Min Access Surg 2013;9:163-167

How to cite this URL:
Jayanthi NG, Dexter SP, Sarela AI, TD. Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Sep 22 ];9:163-167
Available from:;year=2013;volume=9;issue=4;spage=163;epage=167;aulast=Jayanthi;type=0