| [Download PDF]
|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 148-
|How to cite this article:|
. Retraction Notice.J Min Access Surg 2013;9:148-148
|How to cite this URL:|
. Retraction Notice. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 May 25 ];9:148-148
Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2013/9/4/148/119039
On behalf of the Editorial Team of the Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS) we regret to announce that the following paper published in the July - September 2008 issue of JMAS is hereby retracted.
Bansal P, Gupta A, Mongha R, Narayn S, Kundu AK, Chakraborty SS, Das RK, Bera MK Laparoscopic versus open pyleoplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches - a single centre experience of three years. J Min Access Surg 2008;3:76-9.
An identical paper was submitted to the Indian Journal of Surgery whilst it was in peer review with the JMAS and subsequently published in the IJS.
Bansal P, Gupta A, Mongha R, Narayan S, Das RK, Bera M, Chakraborty SC, Kundu AK. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years. Indian J Surg. 2011;73:264-7.
Tehemton E. Udwadia
Editor-in-chief, Journal of Minimal Access Surgery