|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 342-344
Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy and splenectomy for diverticulitis and splenic sarcoidosis
Natalia Kubicki1, Stephen Kavic1, Hugo JR Bonatti2
1 Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA
2 Surgical Services, University of Maryland Community Medical Group, University of Maryland, Easton; Meritus Surgical Specialists, Hagerstown, MD, USA
|Date of Submission||04-Aug-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||22-Oct-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||10-Sep-2019|
Hugo JR Bonatti
Meritus Surgical Specialists, 11110 Medical Campus Road, Suite 147, Hagerstown, MD 21742
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Splenectomy together with colectomy is most commonly performed as a result of iatrogenic injury and not as an additional elective procedure. A 50-year-old African American female presented with recurrent episodes of diverticulitis. She had mediastinal, and porta hepatis lymphadenopathy and subcutaneous nodules, but multiple biopsies were unable to establish the diagnosis. On computed tomography scan, innumerable hypodense splenic lesions were noted. The patient underwent combined laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy and splenectomy. First, the severely inflamed sigmoid colon was mobilised followed by descending colon and splenic flexure. The spleen, which showed multiple granulomas, was dissected out and the hilum secured with a stapler. The rectum was now stapled, the Pfannenstiel incision was reopened, the spleen was removed in a retrieval bag and the colon was pulled out. The colorectal anastomosis was created with an end-to-end anastomotic (circular) stapler. Pathology demonstrated multiple non-caseating granulomas indicative for sarcoidosis and acute/chronic diverticulitis. The patient developed a superficial surgical site infection but no other complications. Prednisone and methotrexate were started and her sarcoidosis improved. She was well at her 2 years of follow-up. Only few patients have an indication for elective splenectomy together with segmental colectomy. The procedure can be safely performed using a laparoscopic approach.
Keywords: Diverticulitis, laparoscopic colectomy, laparoscopic splenectomy, sarcoidosis
|How to cite this article:|
Kubicki N, Kavic S, Bonatti HJ. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy and splenectomy for diverticulitis and splenic sarcoidosis. J Min Access Surg 2019;15:342-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Kubicki N, Kavic S, Bonatti HJ. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy and splenectomy for diverticulitis and splenic sarcoidosis. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 28];15:342-4. Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2019/15/4/342/249438
| ¤ Introduction|| |
Sigmoid diverticulosis is a common finding in the elderly, but only a minority of patients will develop acute diverticulitis. Complicated diverticulitis still requires acute or elective surgical intervention. The hallmarks of modern management of diverticulitis are avoidance of surgery, of a colostomy and an open procedure., Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy has been shown superior to traditional open surgery.
Concomitant removal of other organs with elective or emergency segmental colectomy is rarely done and may include splenectomy., An elective combined laparoscopic en bloc segmental colectomy, distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy has been previously reported for stage 4 colon cancer; however, splenectomy in addition to colectomy is usually unplanned and performed as a result of iatrogenic injury during mobilisation of the splenic flexure. The overall rate of splenic injury during colorectal surgery has been found to be 0.96%, and recent reports indicate that this may not alter outcome.
Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown aetiology that manifests with non-caseating granulomas in affected organs, most commonly the lungs. Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis occurs in up to 30% of patients with 6.7% splenic involvement, which is frequently asymptomatic; splenectomy is indicated for abdominal pain as a result of splenomegaly.
We report an elective combined laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy and splenectomy performed for recurrent diverticulitis and multiple splenic nodules of unknown aetiology which were subsequently found to be a manifestation of sarcoidosis.
| ¤ Case Report|| |
A 50-year-old African American female presented for evaluation for laparoscopic sigmoid resection following the third episode of diverticulitis [Figure 1]a. Her medical history was significant for hypertension, Lyme disease, cardiomyopathy, fibromyalgia and concern for sarcoidosis. She also had undergone an open hysterectomy.
|Figure 1: Computed tomography scan: (a) Acute diverticulitis (b and c) splenic granulomas|
Click here to view
One year before referral for surgery, the patient developed xerostomia, generalised fatigue, dyspnoea and bilateral parotid gland swelling. Imaging revealed bilateral hilar, mediastinal and porta hepatis lymphadenopathy. Biopsies of parotid gland, hilar lymph nodes and porta hepatis lymph nodes and newly developed subcutaneous nodules were all non-diagnostic. Repeat CT-scan showed innumerable hypodense splenic lesions measuring between 5 and 12 mm in diameter [Figure 1]b, [Figure 1]c. She was hospitalised for another episode of acute diverticulitis and started on antibiotics. Laparoscopic splenectomy was offered to the patient to be performed in addition to sigmoid resection.
The patient was placed in lithotomy and 5 mm trocars were placed in the right upper quadrant and umbilicus and a 10–12 mm port in the right lower quadrant. A lighted left ureteral stent had been inserted. The sigmoid colon was mobilised off the left lateral abdominal wall [Figure 2]a; the lighted stent was visualised. A window was created through the sigmoid mesentery and widened towards proximal rectum and descending colon using an EnSeal [Figure 2]b. Again the lighted stent was visualised [Figure 2]c. A 15 mm trocar was placed in the patient's previous Pfannenstiel incision. The lesser sack was opened through the gastrocolic ligament, and the short gastric vessels were divided [Figure 2]d. The splenocolic ligament was divided and the spleen, which showed multiple granulomas was mobilised out of the retroperitoneum [Figure 2]e. The hilum was secured with an Echelon stapler with vascular loads [Figure 2]f. The splenic flexure was completely mobilised and the colon divided below the rectosigmoid junction. The old Pfannenstiel incision was opened from the 15 mm trocar and widened to 5 cm, and the spleen within a retrieval bag was removed. The colon was brought out and divided at an area of good perfusion as determined by indocyanine green (ICG) dye. A 29 end-to-end anastomotic device (circular stapler) (EEA) anvil was tied into the colon conduit, the Pfannenstiel incision was closed and the colorectal anastomosis was created with an EEA stapler. The anastomosis was examined with air testing. Good perfusion was demonstrated again with ICG dye from the abdominal side and transrectally. A pelvic drain looping up into the splenic bed was inserted. Macroscopic examination showed diverticulitis and multiple granulomas throughout the spleen [Figure 3]. Pathology demonstrated multiple non-caseating splenic granulomas establishing the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and the sigmoid colon demonstrated acute/chronic diverticulitis.
|Figure 2: Intraoperative findings: (a-c) Mobilisation of the sigmoid colon (a) dissection of the colon off the lateral abdominal wall (b) window created through sigmoid mesentery (c) after colonic mobilisation lighted left ureter stent is visible (arrow) (d-f) mobilisation and resection of the spleen (d) the lesser sack has been opened exposing the gastric back wall (e) the mobilised spleen shows granulomatous disease (f) the splenic hilum is secured with a vascular load of the Echelon stapler|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Specimens: Sigmoid colon with signs of acute and chronic diverticulitis; spleen with multiple granulomas|
Click here to view
The patient tolerated the procedure well, but the Pfannenstiel incision had to be opened for a superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) after 1 week; she had no other complications. The patient was started on prednisone and methotrexate, and her sarcoidosis symptoms improved. She is alive and well at the 2 years' follow-up.
| ¤ Discussion|| |
We report the rare case of a combined laparoscopic splenectomy and sigmoid colectomy for unrelated conditions. Colectomy was indicated due to her multiple bouts of the complicated diverticular disease. We opted for laparoscopy as this approach has been shown to be associated with reduced post-operative ileus, pain and hospital stays when compared to open surgery. Splenectomy together with colectomy is typically performed as a result of iatrogenic injury. Predictive risk factors for splenic injury during colorectal surgery have been found to include open operations, type of resection (transverse, left or total colectomy) and resections performed for malignancy and diverticulitis. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has a decreased need for incidental splenic procedures thought to be secondary to better visualisation and avoidance of unnecessary traction. Splenic procedures including splenectomy, splenorrhaphy and partial splenectomy performed during colorectal surgery used to be associated with increased length of total hospital stays, re-operation requirement, transfusion requirement and sepsis  but this may be much more common in open colectomies.
A single report of combined elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection and splenectomy has been published in the literature, and this was done as an en bloc resection together with distal pancreatectomy. Our patient experienced an SSSI, but no other complications and recovered well form the combined procedure. The splenectomy yielded a diagnosis of sarcoidosis whereas previous biopsies of skin lesions, mediastinal and liver hilar lymphadenopathy had been inconclusive. This case highlights the value of laparoscopic splenectomy performed in addition to sigmoidectomy as a safe procedure. Indications for such a combined procedure are uncommon.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| ¤ References|| |
Etzioni DA, Mack TM, Beart RW Jr., Kaiser AM. Diverticulitis in the United States: 1998-2005: Changing patterns of disease and treatment. Ann Surg 2009;249:210-7.
Gervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T, Schiffer E, Morel P. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg 2010;252:3-8.
Hassan I, Pacheco PE, Markwell SJ, Ahad S. Additional procedures performed during elective colon surgery and their adverse impact on postoperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:527-34.
Kapur V, Krikhely M, Leitman IM. Operative management of splenic rupture and hepatic flexure injury during diagnostic colonoscopy in a patient with adenocarcinoma of the cecum. J Surg Case Rep 2015;2015. pii: rjv021.
Chen TC, Liang JT. Laparoscopic en bloc resection of T4 colon cancer invading the spleen and pancreatic tail. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:581-2.
Lolle I, Pommergaard HC, Schefte DF, Bulut O, Krarup PM, Rosenstock SJ, et al.
Inadvertent splenectomy during resection for colorectal cancer does not increase long-term mortality in a propensity score model: A nationwide cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:1150-9.
Webb AK, Mitchell DN, Bradstreet CM, Salsbury AJ. Splenomegaly and splenectomy in sarcoidosis. J Clin Pathol 1979;32:1050-3.
Isik O, Aytac E, Ashburn J, Ozuner G, Remzi F, Costedio M, et al.
Does laparoscopy reduce splenic injuries during colorectal resections? An assessment from the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1039-44.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]