| ORIGINAL ARTICLE
|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 103-108
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Experience of 60 cases from a developing world hospital
Mudassir Maqbool Wani1, Abdul Munnan Durrani2
1 Department of Surgery, Government Medical College Srinagar, India
2 Department of Urology, Jaypee Hospital, Uttar Pradesh, India
Objective: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, which has been quoted to have a success rate equivalent to open ureterolithotomy for uretric stones, can be performed transperitoneally and retroperitoneally. The aim of the present study is to report our experience with laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy, its results and advantages in the current era of minimally invasive surgery in a developing country.
Patients and Methods: It was a prospective study carried from May 2010 to December 2012. 60 patients diagnosed with upper and middle uretric calculi, with sizes more than 1 cm and with value of more than 1500 hu on CT Urography ,underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy.
Results: All patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy successfully. The mean operative time was 64.53 min. The mean blood loss was 39.83 ml. 3 patients had minor intra-operative complications which were tackled on table. Post-operative complications developed in 3 patients, all minor. There were no major complications. The removal of drain was at (2.7 days). Mean hospital stay was of 3.3 days. Patients reported to their routine activities in 1.78 weeks. During follow-up 3 months later, CT urography revealed normal ureter in all cases.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy has low rate of conversion to open surgery and an acceptable overall complication rates. In selected patients with impacted, hard, large ureteral stones, which are likely to cause diffi-culty in endo-urological procedures, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a reason-able treatment option.
Dr. Mudassir Maqbool Wani
House No.:132, Green Lane Hafiz Colony Peerbagh, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*