|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 109-112
Stealth surgery: Subcutaneous endoscopic excision of benign lesions of head, neck and trunk in children
Veeramaneni Shravan Teja1, Prakash Agarwal2, Raj Kishore Bagdi3
1 Department of General Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Paediatric Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Consultant Pediatric Surgeon, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||29-Sep-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||16-Dec-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||9-Mar-2017|
Veeramaneni Shravan Teja
Flat No: 5E, Jamal Luxors No. 47, Poonamallee High Road, Kattupakkam, Chennai - 600 056, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Subcutaneous endoscopic excision of benign lesions of the head, neck and trunk is a new dimension in paediatric minimally invasive surgery. This study is a case series where cases are operated endoscopically with minimal scars. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective study where in 13 patients who underwent Stealth surgery were enrolled in this study. Factors such as intraoperative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative recovery and appearance and placing of minimal scars at inconspicuous sites were taken into consideration. Results: All patients underwent successful surgery without converting to open surgery. Out of 13 patients, five were torticollis, four were suprasternal dermoid, one had chest wall swelling, one had swelling of arm, one had back lipoma and one had forehead lipoma. The mean operation time was 50 min (range 32-70). All patients were followed up regularly postoperatively. All patients were operated as daycare, less postoperative pain, no evident scars, lower complications related to scars. Conclusion: Subcutaneous endoscopic surgery addresses concerns related to scarring by replacing large visible incisions with smaller incisions placed in inconspicuous locations. This is a safe and effective procedure of early recovery.
Keywords: Endoscopic subcutaneous excision of benign swellings, primary hyperparathyroidism, stealth surgery
|How to cite this article:|
Teja VS, Agarwal P, Bagdi RK. Stealth surgery: Subcutaneous endoscopic excision of benign lesions of head, neck and trunk in children. J Min Access Surg 2017;13:109-12
|How to cite this URL:|
Teja VS, Agarwal P, Bagdi RK. Stealth surgery: Subcutaneous endoscopic excision of benign lesions of head, neck and trunk in children. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 5];13:109-12. Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2017/13/2/109/201729
| ¤ Introduction|| |
Swellings of the head, neck and trunk are almost benign in nature. The most common benign swellings that we come across are lipomas, osteomas, pilomatrixomas and dermoid cysts. Most of these lesions are in the subcutaneous plane. Common method of treating these swellings is to make incisions over the lesion and excise in toto, resulting in scar. Although, in most cases, incisions are placed in skin creases to prevent bad scars. A scar is something that cannot be predicted and the results are not very pleasing to the patient and the family. Many surgical specialities used subcutaneous endoscopic techniques, placing incisions over hidden areas with a goal of scarless surgery. This technique is commonly referred to as Stealth surgery, which derives its name from the word “stealth”, meaning hidden. Stealth surgery entails performing laparoscopic subcutaneous excision of these benign swellings by replacing larger incisions to smaller incisions and placing them in small inconspicuous areas.
We present a series of cases of benign swellings over back, forehead, chest wall, suprasternal region and torticollis, where, similarly, we approached by subcutaneous endoscopic surgery.
| ¤ Patients and Methods|| |
This is a prospective study, where in 13 cases were operated from March 2011 to May 2015. Out of 13 patients, five were torticollis (two males and three females) and, four were suprasternal dermoid (three females and one male), one had chest wall swelling (female), one had swelling of arm (male), one had back lipoma (male) and one had forehead lipoma (female) [Table 1].
All procedures are performed at a university teaching hospital. All families gave consent to proceed with an endoscopic approach after the potential risks and complications of both endoscopic risk and the risk for conversion procedures have been clearly explained.
Depending on the site of lesion, the port sites were planned. If the lesion was in the chest or the back, the axilla was the preferred site of port placement. If the forehead was involved, we inserted the ports in the scalp hairline. After making a small incision for the port, a subcutaneous space was created with a peanut swab, so as to create an operating space for dissecting the lesion. Subsequently, the port was inserted and CO2 inflation was done to distend the subcutaneous space [Figure 1]. Once pneumodistention of the subcutaneous space was done, two other working ports were introduced under vision. A triangulation was made between the ports so that it was ergonomically feasible to dissect the lesion [Figure 2]. Care was taken to achieve haemostasis and to not burn the overlying skin while separating the lesion from the overlying skin. The lesion was removed from one of the port sites, making sure it was in one of the inconspicuous locations. All the gas was squeezed out of the subcutaneous space and a tight compression dressing was kept for 24-48 h, so that it did not form a seroma.
postoperative course and follow-up
All patients are discharged in on the same day and a simple analgesic such as paracetamol was prescribed. The first follow-up visit was 1 week after operation, at suture removal time. At the time of visit, patients were checked for wound complications.
| ¤ Results|| |
All procedures were completed successfully using endoscopic method. There were no conversions to open surgery. The mean operation time was 50 min (range 32-70 min). Blood loss ranged 10-20 mL, which was minimal. All patients are followed up regularly postoperatively. Hospital stay was less than 24 h in all patients, as they were operated as daycare cases. Pain score ranged 2-5 using the Wong Baker Scale, which was adequately managed by oral paracetamol. There were no intraoperative complications or subcutaneous emphysema. There were complications with hand swelling having seroma, managed conservatively and one torticollis in an adolescent boy who took a long time to return to normal movement. Scar was inconspicuous, as it was in the axilla or hairline, depending on the pathology. There was no wound infection and healing was adequate and satisfactory. There was no haematoma or ecchymosis of the skin. All scars healed well with an excellent cosmetic result [Figure 3].
| ¤ Discussion|| |
All benign conditions of the head and the neck are classically excised by incision over the lesion and removing the swelling in toto, but resulting in a disfigured and ugly scar. Surgical scars of the face and the neck can have a lifelong impact on the self-esteem and socialisation of patients. Scarring can cause significant pain and discomfort, particularly in patients prone to hypertrophic scar and keloid formation.
The potential complications of infection, seroma, haematoma formation, are very much there in our case series. A recent qualitative study by Brown et al. of 34 patients aged 14-70 years, with varying scars, assessed their physical comfort and functioning, acceptability to self and others, social functioning, confidence in the nature and management of the condition and emotional well-being. They found that most patients (56%) were unsatisfied with the appearance of their scar and 18% of patients' specifically noted anxiety surrounding participation in leisure activities such as swimming and sunbathing. Furthermore, 50% patients reported lowered self-confidence, 26% patients reported pain and 44% patients reported itching. Taking this into consideration, it is in best interest of the surgeon to try to avoid the scar formation wherever and whenever is required.
This case series shows our experience in dealing these benign lesions by a novel new dimension in minimally invasive surgery called Stealth surgery., In a transaxillary approach for torticollis, there are no major neural and vascular structures encountered during the tunneling. Care should be taken while tunneling to make sure the plain is above the pectoralis fascia and not to traverse through the platysma, as this is a thin muscle. In patients undergoing torticollis correction, they should be counselled regarding the importance of physiotherapy in regaining the function back.
In forehead and suprasternal midline lesions, appropriate imaging has to be done to rule out extension into the cavities. In none of our cases was there intracranial extension. Especially for forehead midline benign swellings, to rule out the intracranial extensions and placement of ports in this area to be grossly taken care of, unlike the transaxillary, as there are named functional nerves present on either side of the midline such as the supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves. Damage to these nerves is not feasible., Sometimes, if the cysts break and the contents are released into the cavity, the released contents can be cleared by suction, with a wash to be given.
Stealth surgery is a simple and effective way to deal these lesions and avoiding the larger incisions and thereby avoiding the scars. Operative times are reasonably fair, compared to other series. Blood loss is not a major complication as seen in our series. Endoscopic techniques are relatively safer in removing the benign lesions with excellent cosmesis. Paediatric surgeons can adopt these techniques with basic minimal access surgical skills. Similar techniques may be useful for the removal of benign masses and other exposed regions of the body, where there is an option of placing the scar in the hidden areas.
| ¤ Conclusion|| |
Subcutaneous endoscopic surgery addresses concerns related to scarring by replacing large visible incisions with smaller incisions placed in inconspicuous locations. This is a safe and effective procedure leading to early recovery. It should be preferred operation in children with benign swelling in exposed areas of the body.
We acknowledge with thanks the role of the anaesthetist and paediatrics department for proper management of these cases.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| ¤ References|| |
Dutta S, Lorenz HP, Albanese CT. Endoscopic excision of benign forehead masses: A novel approach for pediatric general surgeons. J Pediatric Surg 2006;41:1874-8.
Pricola KL, Dutta S. Stealth surgery: Subcutaneous endoscopic excision of benign lesions of the trunk and lower extremity. J Pediatric Surg 2010;45:840-4.
Dutta S, Albanese CT. Transaxillary subcutaneous endoscopic release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle for treatment of persistent torticollis. J Pedistr Surg 2008;43:447-50.
Brown BC, McKenna SP, Siddhi K, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. The hidden cost of skin scars: Quality of life after skin scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1049-58.
Dutta S, Slater B, Butler M, Albanese CT. “Stealth surgery”: Transaxillary subcutaneous endoscopic excision of benign neck lesions. J Pediatric Surg 2008;43:2070-4.
Burstein FD, Cohen SR. Endoscopic surgical treatment for congenital muscular torticollis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101;20-6.
Guerrissi JO. Endoscopic excision of frontozygomatic dermoid cysts. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:618-22.
Lachica RD, Wallace RD, Tsujimura RB. Case report: Endoscopic excision of a nasoglabellar dermoid. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:473-7.
Huang MH, Cohen SR, Burstein FD, Simms CA. Endoscopic pediatric plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1997;38:1-8.
Lobe TE, Wright SK, Irish MS. Novel uses of surgical robotics in head and neck surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15;647-52.
Lin SD, Lee SS, Chang KP, Lin TM, Lu DK, Tsai CC. Endoscopic excision of benign tumours in the forehead and brow. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:1-4.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]