Users Online : 1385 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (159 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed812    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded91    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents     
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 165-166
 

The operating laparoscope: Time for a revival?


Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London SE13 6LH, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication2-Nov-2012

Correspondence Address:
Philip Ng
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London SE13 6LH
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.103137

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Ng P. The operating laparoscope: Time for a revival?. J Min Access Surg 2012;8:165-6

How to cite this URL:
Ng P. The operating laparoscope: Time for a revival?. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jun 19];8:165-6. Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2012/8/4/165/103137


Dear Sir,

I am grateful to Khosla and Ponsky for making the readership rediscover the usefulness of operating laparoscopes, in their nicely illustrated article. There are still many unused, forgotten, operating laparoscopes in the cupboards of most hospitals, which could be usefully recommissioned in these lean times. We had our own period of retro revival in the 1990s, when we described their usefulness in two publications. 'Single-puncture gastrostomy' [1] and 'One-puncture appendicectomy,' [2] and have used them ever since. The method works well in thin adults and in those whose mobile appendices reach the anterior abdominal wall. The main limitations are a zero degree telescope, with about equivalent fibrelight bundles of a 7 mm scope, to accommodate the instrument channel, which varies between 3.5 mm and 5 mm. [3] Admittedly the technology currently available for gel ports and instruments are much improved, allowing for much greater freedom of movement. Newer, longer, 30 degree or 45 degree-angled telescopes should improve vision further. The original single port, single-port access, single site, and single-puncture surgery precedes our own efforts by many years, and was pioneered by those who designed the operating telescope. Is the present single-port surgery trying to reinvent the wheel or just improve it? [3]

 
  References Top

1.Ng PC. Single puncture laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1997;7:173-5.   Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Ng PC. One puncture laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;7:22-4.   Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Curcillo PG 2 nd . Single Port Access (SPA™) gastrostomy tube in patients unable to receive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1142-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04