Users Online : 1469 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
  Search
 
 ¤  Next article
 ¤  Previous article 
 ¤  Table of Contents
  
 ¤   Similar in PUBMED
 ¤  Search Pubmed for
 ¤  Search in Google Scholar for
 ¤Related articles
 ¤   Article in PDF (952 KB)
 ¤   Citation Manager
 ¤   Access Statistics
 ¤   Reader Comments
 ¤   Email Alert *
 ¤   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 ¤  Abstract
 ¤  Introduction
 ¤  Case Reports
 ¤  Discussion
 ¤  Conclusion
 ¤  References
 ¤  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2377    
    Printed135    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded135    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal

 


 
UNUSUAL CASE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 53-55
 

Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature


1 Department of Urology, Bhopal Memorial Hospital & Research Centre, Bhopal - 462 038, India
2 Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College & Hospital, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai - 410 209, India

Date of Submission30-Dec-2009
Date of Acceptance09-Feb-2010
Date of Web Publication6-Jul-2010

Correspondence Address:
Onkar Singh
VPO- Sangowal, Tehsil- Nakodar, District - Jalandhar, Punjab - 144 041
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.65166

Rights and Permissions

 ¤ Abstract 

We report two cases of retrocaval ureter that were successfully treated by a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach. Presentation of both these cases was with flank pain. Ureteroureterostomy using an intracorporeal suture technique was performed for one, and pyelopyelostomy for the other case. Operative time was 120 min and 110 min, respectively. Pyelopyelostomy was technically easier to perform than ureteroureterostomy that required an extra fourth port insertion to facilitate dissection. With increasing experience with the intracorporeal suturing laparoscopic technique of either pyelopyelostomy or ureteroureterostomy should be the first choice for retrocaval ureter.


Keywords: Retrocaval ureter, laparoscopy, pyelopyelostomy, ureteroureterostomy


How to cite this article:
Singh O, Gupta SS, Hastir A, Arvind N. Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Min Access Surg 2010;6:53-5

How to cite this URL:
Singh O, Gupta SS, Hastir A, Arvind N. Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 19];6:53-5. Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2010/6/2/53/65166



 ¤ Introduction Top


Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly that results in external ureteral compression by the inferior vena cava, and becomes symptomatic in the third or fourth decade of life. [1],[2] Ureteroureterostomy and pyelopyelostomy by open surgery have been the gold standard treatment options for retrocaval ureter for many years. Although, only sporadic cases are reported in the literature, our experience with the laparoscopic approach for retrocaval ureter surgery and intracorporeal suturing has increased a lot over recent years, thus, rapidly making it the standard approach. [3] We present two cases of this uncommon anomaly treated with laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy.


 ¤ Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 21-year-old male presented with 2 months history of intermittent right flank pain. Physical examination and urine analysis were found to be normal. Haemogram and renal function tests were unremarkable. Ultrasonography (USG) revealed moderate right hydronephrosis with dilatation of proximal ureter. Excretory urography showed classical reverse-J deformity of right proximal ureter with right hydrouretero nephrosis [Figure 1] with a provisional diagnosis of retrocaval ureter. A three port approach with a primary port at 2.5 cm to the right of umbilicus, a 5 mm port midway between the primary port and right costal margin, and on right mid-clavicular line, and another 5 mm port midway between the antero-superior iliac spine and the umbilicus was used while the patient was placed in the 45 0 left lateral position. After reflecting the ascending colon medially, the ureter was identified in the retroperitoneum coursing posterior to the inferior vena cava (IVC), and dissected up to the lateral border of IVC [Figure 2]. Mobilization of the ureter in the interaortocaval region required another 5 mm port to be inserted at the flank. The retrocaval portion of the ureter was dissected out and appeared artetic, so excised [Figure 2]. A double J-stent was inserted laparoscopically in an antegrade manner. After spatulating the distal ureter, ureteroureterostomy was done with 4-0 polyglactin sutures. A closed suction drain was placed and kept for 48 h. The operative time was 120 min. The patient was discharged after 72 h and stent was removed after 4 weeks postoperatively. At 4 months follow up, he was asymptomatic and excretory urography did not reveal any evidence of obstruction.

Case 2

A 24-year-old female presented with recurrent episodes of loin pain of 18 months duration. Physical examination and urine analysis was normal. Haemogram and renal function tests were unremarkable. USG showed right hydronephrosis and dilatation of proximal ureter. Excretory urography showed classical fishhook deformity of right proximal ureter just like in the previous case. Provisional diagnosis of retrocaval ureter was made and patient was elected for laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy. First, retrograde pyelography was done to see the course of the ureter. Using the three-port transperitoneal approach, the right renal pelvis was identified and dissected medially up to a point where it was just going underneath the IVC. It was also dissected free in the interaortocaval region [Figure 3]. Renal pelvis just above the ureteropelvic junction was then excised, and retrocaval portion of ureter freed completely. Pyelopyelostomy was performed antero-lateral to the IVC over a double-J stent and by using interrupted 3-0 polyglactin sutures [Figure 3]. A closed suction drain was placed and removed after 48 h. The operative time was 110 min. The patient was discharged after 72 h and stent was removed after 4 weeks postoperatively. Follow up at 5 months post-operatively with USG showed regression of hydronephrosis.


 ¤ Discussion Top


Retrocaval ureter is a rare venous anomaly in which the right ureter courses posterior to the inferior vena cava and partially encircles it. Persistence of the subcardinal vein is the main embryologic event that underlying its development. [1] Since its first description by Hochstetter in 1893, [4] approximately 200 cases have been reported worldwide. Classically open ureteroureterostomy had been the gold standard surgical treatment for this clinical entity for many years. Over recent years, laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy and pyelopyelostomy for retrocaval ureter have been reported sporadically, that has increased our experience with the laparoscopic approach, type of surgery and intracorporeal suturing for this particular anomaly.

Baba et al. in 1994 were the first to perform the laparoscopic pyeloplasty for a retrocaval ureter in 9.3 h. [5] Matsuda et al. then performed the laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy using the five-port approach in 7.5 h. [6] In 1999, Salomon et al. first did the laparoscopic retroperitoneal repair of a retrocaval ureter in 4.5 h, and suggested that this was a more direct approach with greatly reduced operative time. [7] Later, Gupta et al. also found this approach to be safer, easier and less time-consuming (3.5 h) even using three ports. [8] Recently, Tobias-Machado et al. demonstrated a new technique of exteriorizing the ureter from one of the port sites and performing extracorporeal uretero-ureteral anastomosis; thus further reducing the duration of surgery to 130 min. [2] However, more recently, Nagraj et al. reported the shortest operative time of only 100 min with standard transperitoneal three-port laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy. [9] Simforoosh et al. in 2006 reported a series of six cases treated by laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy without excising the retrocaval segment. [1] Advantages mentioned by the authors included excellent outcome, minimal postoperative morbidity, short hospital stay and highly satisfactory cosmetic results, although, mean operative time was 3 h. [1] The most recent report of laparoscopic surgery of retrocaval ureter is by Chung and Gill, in which they performed dismembered pyeloplasty in 3 h. [3] Hemal et al. in 2008 demonstrated the feasibility of pure robotic repair, but found that apart from the ergonomic ease and simpler intracorporeal suturing, it does not appear to provide any great advantage over pure laparoscopy. [10]

The major time consuming part of laparoscopic treatment of the retrocaval ureter had been the intracorporeal anastomosis. Over the time, experience with intracorporeal suturing has built up, leading to greatly reduced operative time from 9.3 h to less than 2 h.

In our first case, the retrocaval segment of the ureter after dissection appeared atretic. So, ureteroureterostomy was performed after excision of the atretic segment. While in the second case, retrocaval portion of the ureter was grossly normal, so we proceeded with pyelopyelostomy.

Our reports indicate that both laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy are safe and effective, and can be performed in reasonable operative time. However, pyelopyelostomy because of its technical similarity to a standard pyeloplasty with which most practicing uro-surgeons are well versed and confident while doing, is to be preferred over ureteroureterostomy, at least in today's time. Moreover, pyelopyelostomy may lead to lower stricture rate [10] and has an obvious advantage if associated pelvic stone is present. Also, relative preference may be specifically given to ureteroureterostomy if the retrocaval segment of the ureter appears grossly atretic; although Chung and Gill have performed pyeloplasty with normal urine flow at 6 months of follow-up, in a case of retrocaval ureter in which the retrocaval portion of the ureter appeared atretic. [3]


 ¤ Conclusion Top


Both laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy and pyelopyelostomy are safe and effective modes of treatment of retrocaval ureter. Laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy is technically simpler; can be performed with higher level of confidence and should be preferred if retrocaval ureter is associated with pelvic stone. Ureteroureterostomy may be specifically preferred over pyelopyelostomy when the retrocaval segment of the ureter appears grossly atretic.

 
 ¤ References Top

1.Simforoosh N, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Tabibi A. Laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for retrocaval ureter without excision of the retrocaval segment: First report of six cases. J Urol 2006;175:2166-9.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Tobias-Machado M, Lasmar MT, Wroclawski ER. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery with extracorporeal ureteroureteral anastomosis for treating retrocaval ureter. Int Braz J Urol 2005;31:147-50.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Chung BI, Gill IS. Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty of a Retrocaval Ureter: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Eur Urol 2008;54:1433-6.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Ouyang CC, Chueh SC, Hsu TC, Chen J, Tsai TC, Chiu TY. Retrocaval ureter- three case reports and review of the literature. J Urol ROC 1994;5:49-53.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Baba S, Oya M, Miyahara M, Deguchi N, Tazaki H. Laparoscopic surgical correction of circumcaval ureter. Urology 1994;44:122-6.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]    
6.Matsuda T, Yasumoto R, Tsujino T. Laparoscopic treatment of a retrocaval ureter. Eur Urol 1996;29:115-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]    
7.Salomon L, Hoznek A, Balian C, Gasman D, Chopin DK, Abbou CC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy of a retrocaval ureter. BJU Int 1999;84:181-2.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Singh I, Khaitan A. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolysis and reconstruction of retrocaval ureter. J Endourol 2001;15:291-3.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Nagraj HK, Kishore TA, Nagalakshmi S. Transperitoneal laparoscopic approach for retrocaval ureter. J Min Access Surg 2006;2:81-2.  Back to cited text no. 9    Medknow Journal  
10.Hemal AK, Rao R, Sharma S, Clement RG. Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. Int Braz J Urol 2008;34:734-8.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy for retrocaval ureter: A report of 15 cases
Jiexiu Zhang,Bianjiang Liu,Ninghong Song,Lixin Hua,Zengjun Wang,Changjun Yin,Wei Zhang
Surgical Practice. 2014; 18(1): 37
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Complementary value of the PET and CT in the correct evaluation of retrocaval ureter [Valor complementario de la PET y la TAC en la correcta valoración del uréter retrocavo]
González-Roiz, C. and García-García-Esquinas, M. and Prieto-Soriano, A. and Salazar-Andía, G. and Cabrera-Martín, M.N. and Carreras-Delgado, J.L.
Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular. 2013; 32(2): 121-122
[Pubmed]
3 Valor complementario de la PET y la TAC en la correcta valoración del uréter retrocavo
C. González-Roiz,M. García-García-Esquinas,A. Prieto-Soriano,G. Salazar-Andía,M.N. Cabrera-Martín,J.L. Carreras-Delgado
Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular. 2013; 32(2): 121
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Complementary value of the PET and CT in the correct evaluation of retrocaval ureter
C. González-Roiz,M. García-García-Esquinas,A. Prieto-Soriano,G. Salazar-Andía,M.N. Cabrera-Martín,J.L. Carreras-Delgado
Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (English Edition). 2013; 32(2): 121
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy and ureteroureterostomy for retrocaval ureter with ureteral calculus: First case report
Zhi Chen,Xiang Chen,Yan-Cheng luo,Yao He,Nan-Nan Li,Chao-Qun Xie,Chen Lai,Xiao-Long Fang
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 2012; 46(6): 437
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy and ureteroureterostomy for retrocaval ureter with ureteral calculus: First case report
Chen, Z. and Chen, X. and Luo, Y.-C. and He, Y. and Li, N.-N. and Xie, C.-Q. and Lai, C. and Fang, X.-L.
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 2012; 46(6): 437-440
[Pubmed]
7 Pure transperitoneal laparoscopic correction of retrocaval ureter
Ding, G.-Q. and Xu, L.-W. and Li, X.-D. and Li, G.-H. and Yu, Y.-L. and Yu, D.-M. and Zhang, Z.-G.
Chinese Medical Journal. 2012; 125(13): 2382-2385
[Pubmed]
8 Treatment of retrocaval ureter by retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy: Experience on 12 patients
Chen, Z. and Chen, X. and Wu, Z.-H. and Luo, Y.-C. and Li, N.-N.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2011; 21(9): 803-807
[Pubmed]
9 Treatment of Retrocaval Ureter by Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureteroureterostomy: Experience on 12 Patients
Zhi Chen,Xiang Chen,Zhong-Hua Wu,Yan-Cheng Luo,Nan-Nan Li
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2011; 21(9): 803
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

© 2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04