Users Online : 447 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
  Search
 
  
 ¤   Similar in PUBMED
 ¤  Search Pubmed for
 ¤  Search in Google Scholar for
 ¤Related articles
 ¤   [PDF Not available] *
 ¤   Citation Manager
 ¤   Access Statistics
 ¤   Reader Comments
 ¤   Email Alert *
 ¤   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 ¤  Abstract
 ¤ Introduction
 ¤  Materials and Me...
 ¤ Results
 ¤ Discussion
 ¤ Conclusion

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6137    
    Printed241    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded320    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 22    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 76-79
 

Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years


Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India

Date of Submission21-Feb-2008
Date of Acceptance12-Aug-2008
Date of Web Publication26-Sep-2008

Correspondence Address:
Punit Bansal
Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, 242 AJC Bose Road, Kolkata- 700 020
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Read associated Retraction Notice: Retraction Notice with this article

DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.43091

Clinical trial registration None

Rights and Permissions

 ¤ Abstract 

Background: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) causes hydronephrosis and progressive renal impairment may ensue if left uncorrected. Open pyeloplasty remains the standard against which new technique must be compared. We compared laparoscopic (LP) and open pyeloplasty (OP) in a randomized prospective trial. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was done from January 2004 to January 2007 in which a total of 28 laparoscopic and 34 open pyeloplasty were done. All laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed transperitoneally. Standard open Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty, spiral flap or VY plasty was done depending on anatomic consideration. Patients were followed with DTPA scan at three months and IVP at six months. Perioperative parameters including operative time, analgesic use, hospital stay, and complication and success rates were compared. Results: Mean total operative time with stent placement in LP group was 244.2 min (188-300 min) compared to 122 min (100-140 min) in OP group. Compared to OP group, the post operative diclofenac requirement was significantly less in LP group (mean 107.14 mg) and OP group required mean of (682.35 mg). The duration of analgesic requirement was also significantly less in LP group. The postoperative hospital stay in LP was mean 3.14 Days (2-7 days) significantly less than the open group mean of 8.29 days (7-11 days). Conclusion: LP has a minimal level of morbidity and short hospital stay compared to open approach. Although, laparoscopic pyeloplasty has the disadvantages of longer operative time and requires significant skill of intracorporeal knotting but it is here to stay and represents an emerging standard of care.


Keywords: Laparoscopy, pyeloplasty, UPJO


How to cite this article:
Bansal P, Gupta A, Mongha R, Narayan S, Kundu A K, Chakraborty S C, Das R K, Bera M K. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years. J Min Access Surg 2008;4:76-9

How to cite this URL:
Bansal P, Gupta A, Mongha R, Narayan S, Kundu A K, Chakraborty S C, Das R K, Bera M K. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2008 [cited 2018 Oct 18];4:76-9. Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2008/4/3/76/43091


The article found to be Plagiarized and hence been Retracted.





This article has been cited by
1 Trends in the treatment of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction
Jacobs, B.L. and Kaufman, S.R. and Morgenstern, H. and Hollenbeck, B.K. and Stuart Wolf Jr., J. and Hollingsworth, J.M.
Journal of Endourology. 2013; 27(3): 355-360
[Pubmed]
2 Laparoscopic retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty: Single-center experience in China
Hao, G. and Xiao, J. and Yang, P. and Shen, H.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2013; 23(1): 38-41
[Pubmed]
3 Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Single-Center Experience in China
GangYue Hao,Jing Xiao,PeiQian Yang,HongLiang Shen
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2013; 23(1): 38
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Trends in the Treatment of Adults with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
Bruce L. Jacobs,Samuel R. Kaufman,Hal Morgenstern,Brent K. Hollenbeck,J. Stuart Wolf,John M. Hollingsworth
Journal of Endourology. 2013; 27(3): 355
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Determination of Patient Concerns in Choosing Surgery and Preference for Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery and Assessment of Satisfaction with Postoperative Cosmesis
Steven M. Lucas,Jacob Baber,Chandru P. Sundaram
Journal of Endourology. 2012; 26(6): 585
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction with mini review: Laparoscopic or open?
Falahatkar, S. and Roushani, A. and Nasseh, H. and Kazemnezhad, E. and Moghaddam, K.G. and Raoofi, S.M. and Asl, M.M. and Enshaei, A. and Farzan, A.
UroToday International Journal. 2012; 5(4)
[Pubmed]
7 Determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis
Lucas, S.M. and Baber, J. and Sundaram, C.P.
Journal of Endourology. 2012; 26(6): 585-591
[Pubmed]
8 Minimal invasive pyeloplasty technique with vertical surgical approach: An alternative to laparoscopic pyeloplasty
Coşkun Şahin, Mehmet Kalkan, Hakkı Uzun
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012;
[VIEW] | [DOI]
9 Comparison of the operation time and complications between conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty
E. García-Galisteo, E. Emmanuel-Tejero, P. Navarro Vílchez, J. García-Galisteo, V. Baena-González
Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2012;
[VIEW] | [DOI]
10 Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty<sup>*</sup>
Steven M. Lucas, Chandru P. Sundaram
Journal of Endourology. 2011; 25(2): 167
[VIEW] | [DOI]
11 Factors That Impact the Outcome of Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty: Results of the Multi-Institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group
The Journal of Urology. 2011;
[VIEW] | [DOI]
12 Hidden Incision Endoscopic Surgery: Description of Technique, Parental Satisfaction and Applications
Patricio C. Gargollo
The Journal of Urology. 2011; 185(4): 1425
[VIEW] | [DOI]
13 Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: Report of 49 cases
Umari, P. and Lissiani, A. and Trombetta, C. and Belgrano, E.
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2011; 83(4): 169-174
[Pubmed]
14 Comparison of the operation time and complications between conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty [Comparación del tiempo operatorio y complicaciones entre la pieloplastia laparoscópica convencional y robótica]
García-Galisteo, E. and Emmanuel-Tejero, E. and Navarro Vílchez, P. and García-Galisteo, J. and Baena-González, V.
Actas Urologicas Espanolas. 2011; 35(9): 523-528
[Pubmed]
15 Wilkeæs syndrome. A rare cause of duodenal obstruction
Lorentziadis, M.L.
Annals of Gastroenterology. 2011; 24(1): 59-61
[Pubmed]
16 Comparación del tiempo operatorio y complicaciones entre la pieloplastia laparoscópica convencional y robótica
E. García-Galisteo,E. Emmanuel-Tejero,P. Navarro Vílchez,J. García-Galisteo,V. Baena-González
Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2011; 35(9): 523
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
Steven Mark Lucas, Chandru P. Sundaram
Journal of Endourology Part B Videourology. 2011; 25(1)
[VIEW] | [DOI]
18 Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hong Mei, Jiarui Pu, Chunlei Yang, Huanyu Zhang, Liduan Zheng, Qiangsong Tong
Journal of Endourology. 2011; 25(5): 727
[VIEW] | [DOI]
19 Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Multicentric Comparative Study of Techniques and Accesses
Roberto Vaz Juliano, Rafaela R. Mendonça, Fernando Meyer, Maurício Rubinstein, Marco Túlio Coelho Lasmar, Fernando Korkes, Alessandro Tavares, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2011; 21(5): 399
[VIEW] | [DOI]
20 Laparoscopic lysis of duodenum for superior mesenteric artery syndrome: How and why we do it?
Wu, Q.-H., Wang, M.-L., Zang, L., Zhang, T., Zheng, M.-H.
Chinese Medical Journal. 2010; 123(15): 2148-2150
[Pubmed]
21 A comprehensive review of superior mesenteric artery syndrome
Mandarry, M.T., Zhao, L., Zhang, C., Wei, Z.Q.
European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca. 2010; 42(5): 229-236
[Pubmed]
22 Robotic duodenojejunostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a teenager
Bütter, A., Jayaraman, S., Schlachta, C.
Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2010; 4(4): 265-269
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

© 2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04