ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 76-79

Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years

Punit Bansal, Aman Gupta, Ritesh Mongha, Srinivas Narayan, AK Kundu, SC Chakraborty, RK Das, MK Bera
Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India

Correspondence Address:
Punit Bansal
Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, 242 AJC Bose Road, Kolkata- 700 020
India

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Check

5

Read associated Retraction Notice: Retraction Notice with this article

DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.43091

Clinical trial registration None

Background: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) causes hydronephrosis and progressive renal impairment may ensue if left uncorrected. Open pyeloplasty remains the standard against which new technique must be compared. We compared laparoscopic (LP) and open pyeloplasty (OP) in a randomized prospective trial. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was done from January 2004 to January 2007 in which a total of 28 laparoscopic and 34 open pyeloplasty were done. All laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed transperitoneally. Standard open Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty, spiral flap or VY plasty was done depending on anatomic consideration. Patients were followed with DTPA scan at three months and IVP at six months. Perioperative parameters including operative time, analgesic use, hospital stay, and complication and success rates were compared. Results: Mean total operative time with stent placement in LP group was 244.2 min (188-300 min) compared to 122 min (100-140 min) in OP group. Compared to OP group, the post operative diclofenac requirement was significantly less in LP group (mean 107.14 mg) and OP group required mean of (682.35 mg). The duration of analgesic requirement was also significantly less in LP group. The postoperative hospital stay in LP was mean 3.14 Days (2-7 days) significantly less than the open group mean of 8.29 days (7-11 days). Conclusion: LP has a minimal level of morbidity and short hospital stay compared to open approach. Although, laparoscopic pyeloplasty has the disadvantages of longer operative time and requires significant skill of intracorporeal knotting but it is here to stay and represents an emerging standard of care.

Keywords: Laparoscopy, pyeloplasty, UPJO

The article found to be Plagiarized and hence been Retracted.

This article has been cited by 1 Trends in the treatment of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction Jacobs, B.L. and Kaufman, S.R. and Morgenstern, H. and Hollenbeck, B.K. and Stuart Wolf Jr., J. and Hollingsworth, J.M. Journal of Endourology. 2013; 27(3): 355-360 [Pubmed] 2 Laparoscopic retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty: Single-center experience in China Hao, G. and Xiao, J. and Yang, P. and Shen, H. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2013; 23(1): 38-41 [Pubmed] 3 Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Single-Center Experience in China GangYue Hao,Jing Xiao,PeiQian Yang,HongLiang Shen Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2013; 23(1): 38 [Pubmed] | [DOI] 4 Trends in the Treatment of Adults with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Bruce L. Jacobs,Samuel R. Kaufman,Hal Morgenstern,Brent K. Hollenbeck,J. Stuart Wolf,John M. Hollingsworth Journal of Endourology. 2013; 27(3): 355 [Pubmed] | [DOI] 5 Determination of Patient Concerns in Choosing Surgery and Preference for Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery and Assessment of Satisfaction with Postoperative Cosmesis Steven M. Lucas,Jacob Baber,Chandru P. Sundaram Journal of Endourology. 2012; 26(6): 585 [Pubmed] | [DOI] 6 Pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction with mini review: Laparoscopic or open? Falahatkar, S. and Roushani, A. and Nasseh, H. and Kazemnezhad, E. and Moghaddam, K.G. and Raoofi, S.M. and Asl, M.M. and Enshaei, A. and Farzan, A. UroToday International Journal. 2012; 5(4) [Pubmed] 7 Determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis Lucas, S.M. and Baber, J. and Sundaram, C.P. Journal of Endourology. 2012; 26(6): 585-591 [Pubmed] 8 Minimal invasive pyeloplasty technique with vertical surgical approach: An alternative to laparoscopic pyeloplasty Coşkun Şahin, Mehmet Kalkan, Hakkı Uzun The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012; [VIEW] | [DOI] 9 Comparison of the operation time and complications between conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty E. García-Galisteo, E. Emmanuel-Tejero, P. Navarro Vílchez, J. García-Galisteo, V. Baena-González Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2012; [VIEW] | [DOI] 10 Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty<sup>*</sup> Steven M. Lucas, Chandru P. Sundaram Journal of Endourology. 2011; 25(2): 167 [VIEW] | [DOI] 11 Factors That Impact the Outcome of Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty: Results of the Multi-Institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group The Journal of Urology. 2011; [VIEW] | [DOI] 12 Hidden Incision Endoscopic Surgery: Description of Technique, Parental Satisfaction and Applications Patricio C. Gargollo The Journal of Urology. 2011; 185(4): 1425 [VIEW] | [DOI] 13 Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: Report of 49 cases Umari, P. and Lissiani, A. and Trombetta, C. and Belgrano, E. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2011; 83(4): 169-174 [Pubmed] 14 Comparison of the operation time and complications between conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty [Comparación del tiempo operatorio y complicaciones entre la pieloplastia laparoscópica convencional y robótica] García-Galisteo, E. and Emmanuel-Tejero, E. and Navarro Vílchez, P. and García-Galisteo, J. and Baena-González, V. Actas Urologicas Espanolas. 2011; 35(9): 523-528 [Pubmed] 15 Wilkeæs syndrome. A rare cause of duodenal obstruction Lorentziadis, M.L. Annals of Gastroenterology. 2011; 24(1): 59-61 [Pubmed] 16 Comparación del tiempo operatorio y complicaciones entre la pieloplastia laparoscópica convencional y robótica E. García-Galisteo,E. Emmanuel-Tejero,P. Navarro Vílchez,J. García-Galisteo,V. Baena-González Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2011; 35(9): 523 [Pubmed] | [DOI] 17 Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Steven Mark Lucas, Chandru P. Sundaram Journal of Endourology Part B Videourology. 2011; 25(1) [VIEW] | [DOI] 18 Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hong Mei, Jiarui Pu, Chunlei Yang, Huanyu Zhang, Liduan Zheng, Qiangsong Tong Journal of Endourology. 2011; 25(5): 727 [VIEW] | [DOI] 19 Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Multicentric Comparative Study of Techniques and Accesses Roberto Vaz Juliano, Rafaela R. Mendonça, Fernando Meyer, Maurício Rubinstein, Marco Túlio Coelho Lasmar, Fernando Korkes, Alessandro Tavares, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Marcos Tobias-Machado Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2011; 21(5): 399 [VIEW] | [DOI] 20 Laparoscopic lysis of duodenum for superior mesenteric artery syndrome: How and why we do it? Wu, Q.-H., Wang, M.-L., Zang, L., Zhang, T., Zheng, M.-H. Chinese Medical Journal. 2010; 123(15): 2148-2150 [Pubmed] 21 A comprehensive review of superior mesenteric artery syndrome Mandarry, M.T., Zhao, L., Zhang, C., Wei, Z.Q. European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca. 2010; 42(5): 229-236 [Pubmed] 22 Robotic duodenojejunostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a teenager Bütter, A., Jayaraman, S., Schlachta, C. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2010; 4(4): 265-269 [Pubmed]