Users Online : 323 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (141 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3295    
    Printed125    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded222    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 178
 

Empyema gall bladder and laparoscopic cholecystectomy


Post Graduate Department of Surgery, Govt Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India

Date of Submission10-Oct-2007
Date of Acceptance11-Oct-2007

Correspondence Address:
Iqbal Saleem Mir
Post Graduate Department of Surgery, Govt Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.38913

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Mir IS. Empyema gall bladder and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Min Access Surg 2007;3:178

How to cite this URL:
Mir IS. Empyema gall bladder and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Aug 12];3:178. Available from: http://www.journalofmas.com/text.asp?2007/3/4/178/38913


Dear sir,

I read the article about laparoscopic management of empyema gall bladder [1] with interest. Some points documented underneath need clarification as the authors have not given the details.

How was the gall bladder extracted? Was an extraction bag used?

The role of analysis by SPSS version 10 has not been further elucidated anywhere in the text. What variable was being assessed?

In the exclusion criteria did the authors exclude patients with bleeding disorders?

The USG findings discussed are non-specific and usually it is quite difficult to predict empyema gall bladder with these findings. We have found out that a thick-walled gall bladder >4 mm with a stuck stone at the neck is more of a predictor of empyema than other findings mentioned. Even the clinical features are sometimes misleading.

In table 3A the number of CBD injuries shown is 3 while as in the discussion repair of only two cases is documented. Which one is correct?

After conversion what were the results? Was cholecystectomy completed in all patients?

What is the role of intraoperative cholangiography in such cases?

What is the role of laparoscopic cholecystostomy in empyema gallbladder? Would it have decreased the overall conversion and the complication rates?

Did the very high morbidity documented justify the early intervention in pre-surgery documented cases of empyema?

 
  References Top

1.Malik A, Laghari AA, Talpur KA, Memon A, Mallah Q, Memon JM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in empyema of gall bladder: An experience at Liaquat University Hospital, Jamshoro, Pakistan. J Min Access Surg 2007;3:52-6.  Back to cited text no. 1    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04